№ 1040GitHub
CursorBench 4.0 score-vs-cost report
A self-contained visual report comparing CursorBench 4.0 score against cost per task for Opus 5.5, Fable 5.1, Grok 4.7 and Muse Spark 1.3, where Muse Spark 1.3 Max scores 41.6% at $2.64 per task. GPT-6 points are clearly marked as estimates.
# CursorBench 4.0 — Selected Models Report Visual report of [CursorBench 4.0](https://cursor.com/cursorbench) focused on: - Claude Opus 5.5 - Claude Fable 5.1 - Grok 4.7 - Muse Spark 1.3 - GPT-6 Astra *(estimate)* - GPT-6 Luna *(estimate)* ## Important **Cursor has not published GPT-6 CursorBench scores.** Astra and Luna placements are unofficial rough estimates derived from relative performance on FrontierCode 1.1 and Terminal-Bench 4.0 versus models that do have official CursorBench results. Treat them as illustrative, not as Cursor-published numbers. ## Files | File | Description | |------|-------------| | [index.html](index.html) | Self-contained HTML report (charts embedded) | | [cursorbench-4.0-score-vs-cost.png](cursorbench-4.0-score-vs-cost.png) | Score vs cost scatter (log cost) | | [cursorbench-4.0-top-bar.png](cursorbench-4.0-top-bar.png) | Horizontal ranking by score | | [data.json](data.json) | Plotted points with `estimated` flags | | [throughput.json](throughput.json) | Family average output tokens/s (Artificial Analysis) | ## Official headline scores | Model | Score | Cost / task | |-------|------:|------------:| | Opus 5.5 Max | 57.8% | $13.43 | | Fable 5.1 Max | 51.8% | $17.28 | | Grok 4.7 Extra High | 46.3% | $6.01 | | Muse Spark 1.3 Max | 41.6% | $2.64 | ## Estimated placements | Model | Est. score | Est. cost / task | |-------|-----------:|-----------------:| | GPT-6 Astra Max | ~54% | ~$8.50 | | GPT-6 Luna Max | ~31% | ~$0.22 | Official data from [cursor.com/cursorbench](https://cursor.com/cursorbench) (Sep 2026). Not affiliated with Cursor. ## Live page https://dominicletz.github.io/cursorbench-4.0-report/





ChatForm
Tgmlabs